Roobet Crash vs Shuffle Crash — ライブ統計・RTP・直接比較
Roobet Crash vs Shuffle Crash: ライブ統計の並列比較、RTP、最大勝利。無料トラッカー、登録不要。
最近のマルチプライヤー分布
Roobet Crash: 500 ラウンド · Crash: 500 ラウンド| Roobet Crash | Crash | |
|---|---|---|
| マルチプライヤー中央値 | 1.93× | 1.93× |
| ラウンド ≥ 2× | 48.0% | 47.6% |
| ラウンド ≥ 10× | 10.8% | 10.2% |
| ラウンド ≥ 100× | 1.40% | 0.40% |
| 最高記録 | 628.39× | 1533.72× |
Roobet Crash vs Shuffle Crash
Both are provably-fair crash-style games. Roobet Crash is Roobet's hash-chain crash with independent seeds. Shuffle Crash is Shuffle's crash, GraphQL-fed with ~15–20s rounds.
Each runs on an independent provably-fair seed chain, so results on one have no bearing on the other — comparing them shows the real shape of the data, it doesn't predict the next round.
What the live data shows
The side-by-side panel above pulls the recent multiplier distribution — median, the share of rounds ≥2× / ≥10× / ≥100×, and the highest seen. Differences over a short window are sampling variance, not a structural edge — they converge over enough rounds.
No predictions
These are RNG outputs, not signals. No strategy (Martingale, "wait for a 2×", "the wheel is cold") beats the house edge over time. Use the data for transparency, not as a forecast.
よくある質問
- Are Roobet Crash and Shuffle Crash the same game?
- No. Both are provably-fair crash-style games but with separate implementations/RNG, so their results are independent.
- Which has the better RTP, Roobet Crash or Shuffle Crash?
- They publish very close RTPs for the same category; differences in short-run observed RTP are variance, not a structural edge.